By AppHub Editorial Team · Updated August 3, 2026

Art of War 3:RTS strategy game

Art of War 3:RTS strategy game

4.6
Downloads: 10,000,000+ Reviews: 463,000 Content Rating: Teen
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 1
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 2
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 3
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 4
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 5
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 6
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game screenshot 7

Overview

Category

Strategy

Developer

Gear Games Global

Price

Free

Contains Ads

No

Features

А unique classic real-time strategy game with direct control

for true commanders who are not afraid to face the enemy in real-time PvP battles! For those who want to feel the thrill of victory over a real opponent! For those who can think like a strategist and act decisively in any battlefield situation! For those who just want to fight and blow stuff up! It’s no place for the timid!

Are you ready for the challenge, Commander?

Art of War 3: Global Conflict (AOW)

is a real-time strategy onlin...

Download Art of War 3:RTS strategy game

Get the official app from the trusted app stores. You will be redirected to the download page.

Official Links

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more

Ratings breakdown

463,000 reviews
5★
87%
4★
4%
3★
3%
2★
1%
1★
5%

Developer contact

Name

Gear Games Global FZC

Address

One UAQ Building, Al Barqaa Office 207, Second Floor ام القيوين United Arab Emirates

Phone

+971 56 748 1020

Support

info@geargames.org

Privacy

View policy

Pros & Cons

Based on analysis of Google Play user reviews

Pros

  • The game successfully emulates classic RTS games like Command & Conquer, offering a nostalgic experience.

    Theme 'Classic RTS feel' identified in recent_review #1, #2, and #0

    Evidence (3)
    “Reminds me of C&C generals.”
    Rating: 5★ September 28, 2018 219 likes
    “Great game, very like Command and Conquer, which makes me happy.”
    Rating: 5★ December 15, 2018 77 likes
    “The idea of the game is great, and it does good at playing like a tradtional RTS.”
    Rating: 2★ July 02, 2024 33 likes
  • The single-player campaign is fun, challenging, and completely free to play.

    Theme 'Free single-player campaign' identified in recent_review #2 and #1

    Evidence (2)
    “Fun and challenging single player campaign and skirmishes...”
    Rating: 5★ December 15, 2018 77 likes
    “I've had a ton of fun with the single-player campaign, which is 100% free and challenging.”
    Rating: 5★ December 15, 2018 77 likes
  • The game has impressive graphics and visual presentation.

    Theme 'Great graphics' identified in recent_review #1

    Evidence (1)
    “It looks amazing.”
    Rating: 5★ September 28, 2018 219 likes

Cons

  • Progression is heavily gated by pay-to-win mechanics, making it nearly impossible to compete without spending money.

    Theme 'Pay-to-win progression' identified in recent_review #0, #3, and #4

    Evidence (3)
    “progression is limited by the pay wall.”
    Rating: 2★ July 02, 2024 33 likes
    “100$ can honestly move you forward 3 to 4 months in research within 10 minutes.”
    Rating: 4★ December 26, 2023 21 likes
    “if your not prepared to spend money , then don't expect to play the game much . Because you will either lose”
    Rating: 4★ December 26, 2023 21 likes
  • The tutorial is overly restrictive and hand-holding, limiting player freedom.

    Theme 'Restrictive tutorial' identified in recent_review #1 and #4

    Evidence (2)
    “The tutorial leash is too tight, though. I'm on mission 5 and still being prompted to do every step.”
    Rating: 5★ September 28, 2018 219 likes
    “If the game makes all the decisions and forces me to do them, then what am I doing as the "player" besides watching?”
    Rating: 5★ September 28, 2018 219 likes
  • The game suffers from significant balance issues between factions and poor unit pathfinding.

    Theme 'Balance and pathfinding issues' identified in recent_review #2, #4, and #0

    Evidence (3)
    “It needs some balance changes...”
    Rating: 5★ December 15, 2018 77 likes
    “it has a balancing issue between the two factions.”
    Rating: 2★ October 26, 2019 42 likes
    “my Jaguars get confused and take wrong routes or just can't get to the destination, because it can't path find its way there.”
    Rating: 2★ October 26, 2019 42 likes

Recent Reviews

Jacob Pfeifer

2★

The idea of the game is great, and it does good at playing like a tradtional RTS. I will add, however, that progression is limited by the pay wall. Gameplay wise, other than some significant balancing needs the game in essence is great. I will also add that I did make an in-game purchase, that I did receive. However, about five days after I lost all my progress and I lost my progress, including the purchase. So, until there are some substantive changes (and I get my money back), 2 stars.

July 02, 2024 33 likes

A Google user

5★

So far so good. It looks amazing. Reminds me of C&C generals. The tutorial leash is too tight, though. I'm on mission 5 and still being prompted to do every step. I hate when games tell me what to do, then give me no other choices. If the game makes all the decisions and forces me to do them, then what am I doing as the "player" besides watching? Anyone who needs that much instruction is probably not smart enough for RTS games. The tutorial should explain unit movements, tech tree, resources, building, and special abilities all within the first 2-3 missions, then take off the leash and let us play.

September 28, 2018 219 likes

A Google user

5★

Great game, very like Command and Conquer, which makes me happy. Fun and challenging single player campaign and skirmishes... could be better. It needs some balance changes... I thought it was just me, but other profiles seem to be in similar situations. I haven't spent any money yet and I'm over 130 skirmish on both sides... I've had a ton of fun with the single-player campaign, which is 100% free and challenging. I might want to spend some money to get ahead in skirmishes once the balance issues are fixed, and the single-player campaign is well worth a 5 star review all on it's own. Updated: either the balance issues are fixed or they were in my head all along. I have played an equal number of games for both factions and my win rates are equal, so the perceived balance issues were probably just in my head. I am at 56% at 500+ games played and have not spent money yet. Lots of fun had.

December 15, 2018 77 likes

Shane Mozingo

4★

To be honest this game is great in so many ways . Few bugs that do get in the way , but it's a game and things happen. My biggest issue honestly is the pay to play issue . I don't have a problem supporting the studio . But there are alot of ppl that spend upsurd amounts of money to get ahead in research . 100$ can honestly move you forward 3 to 4 months in research within 10 minutes . So if your not prepared to spend money , then don't expect to play the game much . Because you will either lose

December 26, 2023 21 likes

A Google user

2★

It's a decent game. it has a balancing issue between the two factions. Don't get me started on the cheap tactics that this game has. I believe it shouldn't even be possible to crawl your base into the enemy base and just wreck the enemy base with fortifications, it doesn't make the game fun, it's just annoying. Also the pathfinding is just stupid. my Jaguars get confused and take wrong routes or just can't get to the destination, because it can't path find its way there. Please fix this.

October 26, 2019 42 likes